Search for: "People v. Short" Results 6981 - 7000 of 8,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2007, 2:46 pm
None of that occurred in People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:11 am
And before some wag posts a comment about "it's a start," and compares it to Brown v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:32 pm by Brandon D'Agostino
  Allowing too many people to initiate and manage litigation holds could lead to confusion for IT and will certainly yield different results across multiple matters. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:47 pm by Tung Yin
 Perhaps not, considering that Branstad said recently, "What the people of Iowa want is an opportunity to vote on marriage defined as one man and one woman. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Supreme Court declared the Tenure of Office Act unconstitutional in its ruling in Myers v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:05 am by MAhmet
Some people with the condition (especially females) may be asymptomatic. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:45 am
   At the same time, at least in the short run taken together with some of the other revisions that become effective next month, it may encourage more people to litigate more stubbornly and so make mediation seem less attractive than it did before the changes (just the reverse will be true). [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:13 am by Steve Lubet
Before the end of the year, Ruffin would author the opinion inState v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:16 pm by Nathan Dorn
Essentially, emblemata are formed by the combination of a picture with a short motto and an epigram. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:25 am by Lyle Denniston
  His vote and his opinions created a revolution for gay rights, helped save Roe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:24 am by Colin Murray
’ This interpretation was in turn rejected by the European Court of Human Rights in Gillan and Quinton v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:47 am by Steve Bainbridge
Joshua Fershee: One reason this decision bugs me is that I suspect a good number of people who don't like insider trading restrictions would be supportive of this decision. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:35 am
Supreme Court's decision in Michigan v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 7:00 am by Sam Brunson
That’s what the Supreme Court did in Welsh v. [read post]