Search for: "R v. E" Results 6981 - 7000 of 15,476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2012, 4:17 am
Being at work is an essential job function Dickinson v New York State Unified Ct. [read post]
3 May 2011, 8:04 am by Sylvain Métille
décision rédigée sur 58 pages et suivant un schéma classique. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
Várias pessoas encaminharam mensagens em que solicitam alterações no artigo 967, que estabelece que “os autos poderão ser eliminados por incineração, destruição mecânica ou por outro meio adequado, findo o prazo de cinco anos, contando da data do arquivamento”. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:48 am by Douglas
Diante de todo um conjunto de propostas desconexas e irreais que vêm encontrando espaço no Congresso Constituinte, esta merece apoio irrestrito. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
NE, Comstock Park, MI 49321-9537 Phone: 616-647-2186 E-Mail: jd@ecobizport.com URL: http://www.ecobizport.com BLOG: http://enewsusa.blogspot.com/ [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am by Kelly
Van Valkenburgh (TTABlog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: An ugly trademark ownership decision: Gemmer v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:10 am by Lale Kemal (UK)
Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (Case C-273/00) [2002] ECR I-11737; Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Lion Corporation’, Community trade mark application No. 143 891, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Case R 781/1999-4; Edgar Rice Burroughs Inc v OHIM (R708/2006-4). [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:49 pm
Para Lewandowski, contudo, o sequestro tem caráter permanente até que a vítima seja entregue. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:46 pm
U.S., 08-67), whether using a telephone or e-mail to buy drugs for personal use converts that minor possession crime into a felony, with heavier penalties  (Abuelhawa v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 4:15 am
While a public employer may abolish a position for reasons of economy or efficiency, it may not do so to avoid a civil servant’s statutory rightsMatter of Gallagher v Board of Educ. for Buffalo City School Dist., 2011 NY Slip Op 01163, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentJames F. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:39 am
Alleged abolishment of positions in violation of a provision in a CBA held to be subject to grievance arbitrationMatter of Johnson City Professional Firefighters Local 921 v Village of Johnson City, 2010 NY Slip Op 02890, Decided on April 8, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentSupreme Court, Broome County, denied the Village of Johnson City’s petition to stay arbitration between the parties concerning the Village’s abolishment of certain firefighter positions. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:07 am
”Addressing the merits of Diederich’s ultra vires argument, the court said that “retaining a law firm to prepare an amicus brief for a case pending before the United States Supreme Court that includes an issue of significance to the Authority falls within the powers conferred to the Authority by the Legislature,” citing Public Authorities Law §2053-c [4]; §2053-e [12]..* The brief amicus curiae [friend of the court] had been prepared by Holland & Knight… [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:06 am
Supreme Court rejected Martin’s petition, holding that it was well settled that in order to demonstrate entitlement to §207-c a claimant must prove a direct causal relationship between his or her job duties and the resulting illness or injury, citing Brunner v. [read post]