Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 6981 - 7000 of 30,079
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
Although many judges are lacking in such competence, at least litigants can expect them to read the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence before they read the parties’ briefs and the expert witnesses’ reports. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:19 am by Joseph Koncelik
The NWPR replaces the Obama Administration’s “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) rule. [read post]
7 May 2020, 4:55 pm by Rafael Reyneri
  In 2015, the TCPA was amended to exempt from the ATDS prohibition calls made to collect a debt owed to the United States (the government-debt exception). [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:43 pm by Nirav Bhatt and Bijal Vira
 Question #44 is in apparent conflict with both Part 2(a) of the First Interim Final Rule and Question #3 of the FAQ, which provide that a business is eligible for a PPP loan if the business has “500 or fewer employees whose principal place of residence is in the United States” (emphasis added). [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:57 pm by Leonard L. Gordon and Katelyn J. Patton
United States, 481 U.S. 412 (1987), in which the United States Supreme Court interpreted the jury trial provision of the Seventh Amendment to the federal Constitution and held that where the government seeks both injunctive relief and civil penalties, the defendant is entitled to a jury trial on the question of liability. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:18 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Federal Opening Brief Humane Society Opening Brief Idaho Opening Brief Montana Opening Brief Safari Club Opening Brief Sportsmen’s Alliance Opening Brief Wyoming Farm Bureau Opening Brief Wyoming Opening Brief Crow Answer Brief Northern Cheyenne Tribe Answer Brief Wildearth Guardians Answer Brief Alliance for the Wild Rockies Answer Brief Federal Reply Idaho Reply Montana Reply Brief Safari Club Reply Sportsmen’s Alliance Reply Wyoming Farm Bureau Reply Wyoming Reply Lower court… [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  After all, in 1841 we get the first of the Supreme Court’s slavery point-counter points in United States v. [read post]