Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 6981 - 7000 of 7,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm by Howard Knopf
" She cited a letter sent to defendants that asks $7,500, saying that amount would increase up to $150,000 without prompt payment.The case is Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Two primary sources of guidance: SCt’s unanimous 2012 decision in Hosanna Taber v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
  As CISA Director Jen Easterly noted to the New York Times,[15] the most “critical infrastructure” of the United States is our cognitive infrastructure – the framework and tools by which citizens examine and analyze reality. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  To mark this celebration of Sandy’s 40 years at the University of Texas, I want to argue that constitutional faith provides a path back to democracy in the United States. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:25 am by Tomassi Law Associates
The plan was negotiated in advance with holders of 83 percent or more of the first- and second-lien debt. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
    The recent jury verdict in the Zwerner case in Miami, Florida (U.S. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am by Shannon O'Hare
In July, JP Morgan also cut the weighting of Venezuelan bonds to “zero-weight”, causing prices to fall and forcing holders to sell their positions at severely distressed prices. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by stevemehta
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT JOHN PORTER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:11 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
This is an important case for those of you who recently purchased a car to use in your business, BUT now find yourself needing to file bankruptcy.IN RE DENNIS & JESSICA HASKINSIn re: Dennis & Jessica Haskins, Chapter 13, Debtors.Case No. 09-10520.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 12:35 pm by Florian Mueller
And Motorola's argument that an ex ante (before standardization) perspective on FRAND rates is not acceptable runs counter to Judge Posner's position on FRAND royalties in Apple v. [read post]