Search for: "State v. Little" Results 6981 - 7000 of 23,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 10:50 am by B.W. Barnett
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ recent decision in Uranga v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 8:37 pm by Kurt R. Karst
” It is worth noting that the Secretary of HHS is responsible for many tasks and agencies apart from FDA, and generally has very little influence over the day-to-day review decisions. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 6:44 am
California and, with Justice Souter joining, Zamudio v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm by INFORRM
 It attracted an active betting market, a large volume of tweets and endless speculation about the views of the justices (based on little more than the odd probing question or facial expression). [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While HHS touted the decision as allowing states significant choice, as outlined in more detail in the paragraphs that follow, in reality the parameters within which HHS will require states to exercise this choice provides little flexibility for states to control costs by adopting a limited EHB package. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:43 pm by Hannah Kiddoo
In November 2014, a federal court granted Starland a little more than $7 million. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
As Blackmun noted in his first draft of Doe v. [read post]