Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 6981 - 7000 of 25,494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 5:21 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
 Facilities that provide horrible care and dangerous living conditions are still permitted to keep their doors open. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:41 am
 The facts were as stated in our previous note. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 12:00 am by Rumpole
In Geter v, State, 38 FLW D1405 (3rd DCA June 26, 2013) a remarkable thing occurred: the 3rd DCA denied, en banc (legally: the whole bunch), Geter's request to apply retroactively the US Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
M’Intosh’s discovery doctrine in Wi Parata v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:05 am by Tom Webley
Many privacy class actions falter because plaintiffs allege only a technical violation, but cannot point to any actual or imminent impact that this supposed violation had, or will have, on their lives. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:07 am by Jill
  The United States Supreme Court held in Palmore v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 8:05 am
Indeed, the Court did not sound like it was referring to treatment outside the United States, as in the facts before it, but to anywhere outside PA, including another State. [read post]