Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 14,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Heasley).Non-ownership: Opposer claimed that the mark was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, a California corporation, and therefore that JY Insyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm
As another year draws near its close, a number of notable recent CEQA developments in both the legislative and regulatory arenas have occurred that bear mention. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm
Such was the case on Wednesday in Gelboim v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLP, 806 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2015). [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
On Oct. 5, the Fifth Circuit held in Texas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:52 am
Garske (United States)III.C Views of Law and the Cities· The Interaction between Non-Judicial Mechanisms of Conflict Resolution and the State: the Case Study of Maputo, Concetta Tina Lorizzo, University of Cape Town (South Africa)· Plurality and the City, Julian Sidoli del Ceno, Birmingham City University (United… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:17 pm
In brief, the Ninth Circuit Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Today, I’ll close out by taking the broader view: What does all this tell us about Bivens doctrine? [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:45 am
Certain to provoke heated debate, Dishonorable Passions is a must-read for anyone interested in the history of sexuality and its regulation in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:18 am
The Supreme Court also granted cert in the Mohamad v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
Grp., LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 1:08 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
Can we live in a UNITED States that is so disunited State by State? [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:03 am
Just days after the United States conducted freedom of navigation operations (FONOPS) near Subi Reef, the PLA released photographs of armed naval aircraft training over the disputed Spratly islands. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:51 am
VERRILLI: With Congress, it’s true there have been times in the [United States v.] [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
It is not the case that such an election process to the United States House of Representatives is required by the United States Constitution. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm
United States, 268 U.S. 563, 566 (1925). [read post]
