Search for: "United States v. John" Results 6981 - 7000 of 11,599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  In the article, the authors argue the United States Supreme Court has interpreted the patent eligibility statute in an unconstitutional manner by allowing judicial exceptions to patent eligibility beyond those specifically included in the statute. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
It has been nearly four years since the Supreme Court set off a constitutional revolution in the financing of federal elections, in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The diverging approaches of the majority and the dissenters in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
A Different Question of Open Access: Is There a Public Access Right to Academic Libraries in the United States and Canada? [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm by Ronald Mann
In recent years, we’ve … said … that a statute does not apply outside the United States unless it says that it applies outside the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
TrumpThis case was originally titled Tarla Makaeff et al v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The commission rejected it and opted for the electric chair.For nearly a hundred years after New York’s decision, no state in the United States authorized lethal injection. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:33 am by Rick Houghton
Although the armed forces could employ this prohibition to restrain retirees’ political speech, the government has only initiated court-martial proceedings against one retired service member—nearly one hundred years ago in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
But the fact of the matter is that it is, in fact, the United States military that is in control of these detainees. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Our Constitution calls for an ongoing and perpetual government unless modified under the amendment process set forth in Article V of the Constitution or by revolution. [read post]