Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 24,125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
Moreover, there is already an indication of potential conflict in recent cases filed in the United States in which these issues have been raised (Licea v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:28 am
In an annex to a summons to oral proceedings the board set out its provisional opinion, expressing doubts as to whether the application complied with Article 123(2) EPC (added subject-matter), Article 84 EPC 1973 (clarity and conciseness) and Article 56 EPC 1973 (inventive step).V. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 1:38 pm
The clause expressly states that these purposes are included. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 10:27 am
See, e.g., Alcala v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:06 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has issued an opinion stating the availability of class arbitration is a threshold question for the courts, not an arbitrator, to decide. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 6:18 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
As the US Supreme Court recognized in Miranda v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:32 am
On that front, this year’s biggest news is our new edition of the United States Constitution Annotated (CONAN), a comprehensive explanation of the United States Constitution and of the key Supreme Court cases that interpret it. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:14 pm
In Barrett v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:59 am
In Reichle v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 9:59 am
Search Tip A great place to begin your research on the United States Constitution is with the Constitution Annotated on Congress.gov. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 6:55 am
We recently held that "'the government may not deny a benefit to a person on a basis that infringes his constitutionally protected ... freedom of speech even if he has no entitlement to that benefit.'" United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 6:55 am
We recently held that "'the government may not deny a benefit to a person on a basis that infringes his constitutionally protected ... freedom of speech even if he has no entitlement to that benefit.'" United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
