Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 7001 - 7020
of 21,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2018, 12:15 pm
The issue was first addressed in Cabaniss v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 11:47 am
Erratum: This post originally stated that the bill eliminated the solar tax credit. [read post]
9 May 2018, 5:58 am
Second Circuit Sustains FINRA Bar in Variable Annuity Surrender Case (FINRA NAC Decision; SEC Opinion; and 2Cir Order):In the Matter of Department of Enforcement,Complainant, v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 3:02 am
In both Estate of Tolbert v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 12:13 pm
Circuit Court’s judgment affirming Judge Tanya Chutkan’s April 19 transfer injunction in Doe v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
Five of these laws were passed in past three years and several more states are currently considering bills to prohibit this type of discrimination. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
No. 16-341-JFB-SRF.United States District Court, D. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:36 pm
In that case, Christian v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 6:17 am
Most importantly, the bill only applied prospectively—that is, it only afforded federal copyright protection to sound recordings fixed after the bill’s effective date of February 15, 1972. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
Evening Standard editor George Osborne has criticised the proposed Data Protection Bill stating that cost amendment provisions shifting Claimants’ legal costs to papers would be unduly onerous. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 3:16 pm
The Bill page is here. [read post]
6 May 2018, 1:56 pm
While the Law Division is not bound by the municipal court’s findings of law or fact, it must “give due…regard to the opportunity of the [municipal court] to judge the credibility of the witnesses,” according to the New Jersey Supreme Court 1964 ruling in State v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 1:56 pm
While the Law Division is not bound by the municipal court’s findings of law or fact, it must “give due…regard to the opportunity of the [municipal court] to judge the credibility of the witnesses,” according to the New Jersey Supreme Court 1964 ruling in State v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 10:41 am
(Much recent scholarship has suggested that originalist analyses of Bill of Rights provisions applied to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment should consider the original understanding as of 1868 in addition to that of 1791.) [read post]
5 May 2018, 11:12 am
Supreme Court ruling in Davis v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 10:30 am
Supreme Court’s decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 9:11 am
The amount finally awarded was more than $20,000 after a 20% discount from the amounts billed. [read post]
