Search for: "In Re Brand"
Results 7001 - 7020
of 14,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2022, 6:10 am
Convince your target audience that you’re not like the other firms out there. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 6:45 am
I’ve been able to really connect with brands big and small from different aspects of the brand, not from a marketing-specific perspective. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
Similarly in In re Fosamax Litigation, 2012 WL 181411 (D.N.J. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
They’re constantly trading off options to shape future rents. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
However, sharing official content belonging to FIFA by fans without any commercial benefit is expressly permitted, as per the branding guidance. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
In re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litig., 544 F.3d 1323, [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:00 am
Wither the Publishing Brands? [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:58 am
This means the market window to establish yourself as the actual leader of the segment you’re creating shrinks rapidly with every month delay. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 8:56 am
As an affiliate, most of what you’re trying to accomplish is direct response. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 2:06 pm
Yes, you only have an eye on so much of what they’re doing, because you’re not getting the private view, but the public view can also be very helpful to you. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 10:07 am
Cultivating positive relationships with the media, and getting quoted frequently, is critical to building a solid personal brand -- and your ability to charge commensurate fees. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 2:04 am
Again, even though you’re not technically in sales, you’re still trying to sell a person (top talent) on a concept (working for your business). [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:38 am
And yet, brands and bloggers continue to disregard the law. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: EWHC (Ch): Vodkat falls foul of extended passing-off: Diageo v Intercontinental Brands (IPKat) (Class 46) (IP finance) Director Kappos on USPTO’s (lack of) funding (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IAM) Global Global - General ACTA negotiations, round 7 agenda posted (Michael Geist) (IP Watch) Adding up the… [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm
They link the two through branding. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:54 am
They would have to operate under different brand names: Cravath can’t start up an employment-law subsidiary under its high-end corporate name, for the same reason that Florsheim doesn’t sell basketball sneakers: the brand dilution is too strong. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
(IP Osgoode) Using IP knowledge to make money from shares (IAM) Same WTO Deputy DGs names to new terms (Intellectual Property Watch) WTO Ministerial set for November (Intellectual Property Watch) News from ACTA (BLOG@IP::JUR) A call for your favourite (or least favourite) IP clauses (IP finance) Working together in the digital age – outside counsel should be ‘proactive, available and relevant’ says Dolores Moro of BATMark (Managing Intellectual Property) … [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 8:52 am
That’s part of “branding” and you need to be strategic about your branding. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:26 am
Promoting Your Brand As part of the classic Twitter marketing approach for lawyers, you may have looked for opportunities to promote your brand. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: EU Parliament announces music copyright to be extended 70 years for performers (IPKat) (The IP Factor) (Ars Technica) (Out-Law) House Judiciary Committee patent reform hearings (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Hal Wegner) (Patent Docs) CAFC: Mark is geographically deceptively misdescriptive only if deception is… [read post]
