Search for: "In Re L."
Results 7001 - 7020
of 22,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2009, 4:12 am
L. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
Secondary sources: Forman, Juries and Race in the Nineteenth Century, 113 Yale L. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:00 am
Brian L. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
State Bar of Texas Section Report - Family Law - Winter 2007 by Jimmy L. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
State Bar of Texas Section Report - Family Law - Winter 2007 by Jimmy L. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:08 am
Robinson embodied in § 1415( l ). [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:35 am
” However, the Ninth Circuit, in In re L&J Anaheim Associates, 995 F.2d 940 (1993), held that § 1129(a)(10) does not distinguish between discretionary and economically driven impairment. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
John L Mays has an entire team that is experienced in employment law and clearing the hurdles that most commonly prevent employees from reporting whistleblower issues. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:01 am
Two recent bankruptcy court decisions – In re Hawker Beechcraft, Inc. and In re Contract Research Solutions, Inc. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:35 am
” However, the Ninth Circuit, in In re L&J Anaheim Associates, 995 F.2d 940 (1993), held that § 1129(a)(10) does not distinguish between discretionary and economically driven impairment. [read post]
27 Apr 2006, 4:36 am
Until the CAFC gets a chance to re-think Marvin Ginn and its progeny, the TTAB should follow Judge Bucher's lead and apply some common sense in these "phrase" genericness cases.Copyright John L. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:13 am
Contents include:John Quigley, Britain's Secret Re-Assessment of the Balfour Declaration. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:29 am
"Text Copyright John L. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:31 am
" It therefore reversed the disclaimer requirement.Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:58 am
The mind boggles.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 4:48 am
"Resolving any doubt in Applicant's favor, the Board reversed the refusal to register CLASSIC COLLECTION, and overruled the PTO's requirement that Applicant disclaim that phrase in the other mark.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 4:37 am
"The Board therefore concluded that the PTO had failed to meet its burden of proof, and so the refusals were reversed.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 3:34 am
It begins with the usual Canadian land acknowledgement, which is obligatory even if they’re not giving the land back. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 1:12 pm
But the Board once again observed that, while uniform treatment under the Trademark Act is a goal, the TTAB's task is to decide the case based on the record before it.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:10 am
"Text Copyright John L. [read post]
