Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 7001 - 7020
of 29,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2019, 7:37 am
She then initiated state-court proceedings seeking full custody of the children. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:41 pm
Stross v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
Taylor, the State Department’s Chargé d’Affaires Ad Interim in Ukraine, and George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 10:31 am
At workThe judgmentThe Court recalled that freedom of expression also applies in the context of private employment relations (Heinisch v Germany, No 28274/08) and that the State has a positive obligation to ensure that a fair balance is struck between the competing interest of the individual and of the community as a whole. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:30 am
Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:10 am
Out of the respondents, only the second respondent took part in the appeal (both at UT level and at the Court of Appeal). [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
The rise of online social media—disseminating information, entertainment and opinion at levels unprecedented in all of history and massively dominated by a few big-tech giants—is constitutionally unknown terrain. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
In essence it was a discussion of the level of culpability for such an act. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 2:10 pm
Although the seminal DUI case of Birchfield v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:50 pm
CMS acknowledges the ruling in American Hospital Association et al. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:18 am
Loomis v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
Pieces of the Amount A Puzzle Profit Margin Z Deemed Routine Profits X Deemed Non-Routine Profits Y=Z-X and Y=W+V Deemed Non-Routine Profits Attributable to Markets W Deemed Non-Routine Profits Attributable to Other Factors V To achieve tax certainty and minimize negative economic consequences, it will be important for businesses to have clearly defined metrics that determine the “sustained and significant involvement” for a market jurisdiction to have taxing… [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:58 am
On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
As such, a trade mark could indicate the goods or services of either of the entities without impairing the other’s use, but the defendant must not take steps which exacerbate the level of confusion beyond that which is inevitable, thus encroaching on the claimant’s goodwill.Hacon J stated that it was possible for the status of a concurrent use of a trade mark (whether it was honest or not) could change over time. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Puntenney v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 6:03 pm
She cites, for example, Berry v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Dimaya decision, federal authorities now lean heavily toward handing off terrorism cases involving minors to state-level justice systems. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 4:55 pm
It is on this issue that the differences to Google v CNIL arise. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
A divided Eighth Circuit addressed this in Rodgers v. [read post]
Can Deals That Do Not Trigger an HSR Filing Raise Antitrust Concerns? Yes, Buyer and Sellers Beware!
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
(Final Order, FTC v. [read post]