Search for: "Line v. People" Results 7001 - 7020 of 13,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2008, 2:06 pm
The problem with the standard that was applied is that it comes from a case, Wisiewski v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
So, for example, one public university settled a case with a student who was disciplined for failing to sign a letter in support of same-sex marriage that was going to be sent out publicly; the religious advocacy group that represented the student urged this class v. broader public line. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:52 am by Joe Consumer
" And as we noted in 2013 (extensively quoting a blog post by Paul Bland called “Worst Supreme Court arbitration decision ever”), So, today, in American Express v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:56 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Hannum Conviction for Cyberstalking & Revenge Porn Survives First Amendment Challenge Contacting a Person’s Facebook Friends Isn’t Stalking–People v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:37 am by Jack Goldsmith
‌3d 414 , 434 (9th Cir. 2014) (upholding California statute requiring CNN to provide close captioning on line in California); Online Merchants Guild v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 6:36 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The test originated in the foundational case of Bardal v Globe and Mail Ltd., a 1960 Ontario decision. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:49 am by Legal Beagle
SCOTTISH POLICE have now lost the ability to question suspects without their solicitor being present, after the UK’s Supreme Court in London finally issued its ruling today on the Appeal case of Cadder (Appellant) v Her Majesty's Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland), throwing out the practice in Scotland of being able to question suspects without a solicitor in attendance as being a violation of Human Rights laws.The background to the case : The Appellant was detained by the police… [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]