Search for: "Low v. Low"
Results 7001 - 7020
of 15,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2015, 7:35 am
The Court reminds us the standard articulated in Littlejohn v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
Housing Drones Anyway, apparently the unnamed drone pilot, working for an unnamed estate agent had obviously never watched The Dambusters, because he screwed up the low flying and dinged off the roof of the neighbour’s house, breaking a slate. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:18 am
By Christopher Lowe and Robert T. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:40 am
It noted that the Supreme Court in Gross v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 11:25 pm
Again, Oracle v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:31 pm
The deterrents in Canada along with the penalties for drunk driving are low. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:11 am
On Friday, the en banc Federal Circuit will hear argument in Lexmark v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The employer is a nonprofit organization that collects and distributes unsalable food to low-income individuals. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:25 am
In 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruling in FTC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
In an early case, Willingham v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 11:00 pm
That’s the Half of It: eDiscovery TrendsBelieve it or Not, Apple v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
There could be a third argument- i.e. that they both had the same idea, contributed significant relevant originality (Brighton v Jones [2004]) and, in fact, the selfies are works of joint authorship; there being collaboration present and no need for an intention to create a joint work (Beckingham v Hodgens [2002]). [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am
Garcia v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm
This post concerns the Opinion of the Advocate General in Case C-362/14: Schrems v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm
Some jurisdictions differentiate between high salary earners or tech v. other industries—Hawaii banned noncompetes in tech industry; MOVE Act would ban noncompetes for low-paid workers. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:02 pm
Questions about validity of © are typically not at issue b/c of low © standard; issues of ownership can be troublesome given length of © and transfers, but not generally implicated by fair use disputes; the one area where there is potential notice failure is the Q of clearly delineating the boundaries of the entitlement. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
Distinguish notice of existence v. notice of scope. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:25 am
This case deals specifically with California’s extremely high number of inmates and low pace of executions. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:17 am
Numbers and low quality compound the other issues; discourages search intensity. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:52 am
But the court reduced class counsels’ fees to $370,000, criticizing the notion of awarding a 33 percent fee in employment common-fund class actions (Marshall v. [read post]
