Search for: "Mark E. Howe" Results 7001 - 7020 of 7,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2020, 12:04 pm by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
CSIS experts Victor Cha, Mark Lippert and Sue Mi Terry will speak with Marc Knapper, deputy assistant secretary for Korea and Japan at the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Mark Spannagel, LaMalfa’s chief of staff, signed off on the cease-and-desist letter sent to the Brown family. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:20 pm by LindaMBeale
What is particularly notable about that speech is his claim that it was how he viewed the country's future, and not his particular religion, that should be of interest to voters. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm by admin
”[6] (5) The third edition reports that the differential etiology argument as applied in litigation is often invalid because not all the differentials other than the litigation claim have been ruled out.[7] (6) The third edition properly notes that for diseases for which the causes are largely unknown, such as most birth defects, a differential etiology is of little benefit.[8] Unfortunately, the third edition offered no meaningful guidance for how courts should consider differential… [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:11 am by Benjamin Wittes
  The most vexing problem of the day is not how to close Guantanamo, per se, but how to harness Guantanamo’s turbulence to move us toward a more thoughtful analysis of the armed conflict itself and how we responsibly end the war of which Guantanamo is a byproduct. [read post]
16 May 2010, 4:17 am by Mandelman
Mark Rodgers, a CitiMortgage spokesman, did not respond to questions about the house value, saying only, “We are pleased to have identified a solution for this borrower. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by Schachtman
The argument reminded me of Abraham Lincoln’s famous argument: “How many legs does a dog have if you call his tail a leg? [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:31 am by Eric Goldman
Ever since substitute FOSTA emerged, one of the key questions has been how Senate and House might reconcile the different policy approaches in SESTA and FOSTA if both advanced. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:29 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Assume one trillion possible indicators to sift through: that's about ten events -- e-mails, phone calls, purchases, web surfings, whatever -- per person in the U.S. per day. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
Jack then complained to the CCRC that he had been discriminated against on the basis of his creed.[7]  Jack – probably deliberately – set a potential trap for the CCRC: could it treat a case of alleged discrimination based on religion the same as a case of alleged discrimination based on sexual orientation; could it treat a religiously motivated refusal the same as a secular one; and were these problems dissolved by the differences between requests for a marked cake and a… [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:57 am by Abby Lemert, Eleanor Runde
The new rules mark a major step to regulate China’s online “platform economy. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am by Guest Blogger
Jackson divided clashes between the executive and legislative branches into three familiar situations, and the majority and dissent in Zivotofsky went back and forth over how to apply Jackson's triptych to Menachem's situation, with the majority arguing that Congress was trying impermissibly to mess with exclusively presidential foreign policy powers, and with the dissenters equally strenuously arguing that nothing of the sort was afoot. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:33 pm by Alex R. McQuade
” The meeting of more than 50 world leaders in the U.S. capital was also marked with rising concerns that terrorists, especially the Islamic State, are seeking nuclear weapons or other radioactive material. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:59 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
[W]e recognize that this action today will complicate our ability to support UNESCO’s programs. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:14 am by David Post
The decision is an especially important one, possibly signaling, in Mark Stern’s words over on Slate, that “the judiciary has finally begun to view draconian sex offender laws as the unconstitutional monstrosities they obviously are. [read post]