Search for: "Matter of Estate of Herring" Results 7001 - 7020 of 8,700
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by SHG
  Whether we all run off to do real estate, or wills, or mergers and acquisitions (because their fees make complete sense) doesn't matter. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:30 pm by admin
Under these old “formula” wills, when the first spouse dies assets equal to his or her federal estate exemption go into a “bypass trust” for their kids. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:00 am by Scott David Stewart
-- Compare the real estate taxes and mortgage interest in the tax returns, with the real estate details provided by your spouse. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:25 am by Cut Your Tax Team
All property left in the hands of the court system to distribute is a matter of public record. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:16 am by Ashley Russell
Hat tip to the Jennifer Cochran for her January 7, 2011 post  “Same Sex Divorce Upheld in Texas”. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by admin
In California, the process is more of a private matter between the bank and the homeowner. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:45 am by Scott David Stewart
(Kieran did not refuse payment in his official capacity as personal representative of Leela's estate, so the estate was not part of the appellate court's decision in this case.) [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:45 am by Sheppard Mullin
 Thus, her estate is taxable only on $2 million, and at 35% her estate tax is $700,000. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:45 am by Sheppard Mullin
 Thus, her estate is taxable only on $2 million, and at 35% her estate tax is $700,000. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:45 am by Sheppard Mullin
 Thus, her estate is taxable only on $2 million, and at 35% her estate tax is $700,000. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:45 am by Sheppard Mullin
 Thus, her estate is taxable only on $2 million, and at 35% her estate tax is $700,000. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Since the information published was damaging to Ms Clift’s reputation, her Article 8 rights were engaged and in consequence the Council were under a duty not to interfere with her Article 8(1) rights unless this could be justified under Article 8(2) as necessary and proportionate to a legitimate aim. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:55 pm
This past month, in December of 2010, a Suffolk Superior Court jury awarded her estate $50 million in damages for negligence, and awarded her son $21 million, for her death due to lung cancer. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm by W.F. "Casey" Ebsary, Jr.
No. 155), the owner has drastically changed her statements in this case in an effort to create a genuine issue of fact. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 11:39 am by Scott
The matter is illustrative of difficulties that can even occur in a well-planned estate caused by changed circumstances close to death. [read post]