Search for: "OR Specific, Inc." Results 7001 - 7020 of 37,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 8:59 am by R. David Donoghue
Yesterday, the Federal Circuit handed down its anticipated en banc decision in Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:52 am by Steven Cohen
  The court opined that while he worked at the FDA, he did not work on specific prescription drugs. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:06 am
The Department of Justice recently announced that LifeWatch Services Inc. has agreed to pay the United States $18.5 million to resolve allegations that the company submitted false claims to federal health care programs. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:31 pm by iymanstrawder
Consumers in California have banned together to sue clothing retailers Gap Inc. and Banana Republic for allegedly using false and misleading advertisements to induce customers to pay full-price for items that they believed to be on sale. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 9:23 pm
Pro-Football, Inc., the nearly two-decade old trademark case seeking cancellation of the U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:47 am by D. Daxton White
On January 23, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 203(e) and 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Censure Order as to 1st Discount Brokerage, Inc. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 4:55 am
In re Commerce Bancorp, Inc., Serial No. 76129795 (July 10, 2006) [not citable].The PTO relied on dictionary definitions, on third-party registrations, and on NEXIS excerpts purportedly showing common descriptive use of the term COMMERCE BANK.Applicant got off on the wrong foot by filing a 26-page brief that the Board refused to consider, since it violated Rule 2.142(b) [25-page limit]. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:05 pm by Seth Borden
On the eve of trial, the National Labor Relations Board tonight announced a settlement in American Medical Response of Connecticut, Inc., 34-CA-12576 -- a/k/a/ the "Facebook firing" case. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm
The case specifically claimed Janssen provided benefits to physicians who prescribed Risperdal for such off-label uses, including rewarding them with lucrative consulting agreements. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 2:28 am
The statute specifically states "the" notice, not merely "notice. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:10 am
The women endured verbal harassment from the manager in the form of inappropriate comments on the women's appearance and even comments on specific body parts. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm by Bryn Miller
” SSFUSD seeks damages for Juul’s marketing efforts that specifically targeted youth under the age of 18 with advertising and messaging designed to appeal to minors. [read post]