Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 7001 - 7020 of 178,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On April 27, 2021, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held in a two to one decision that a plaintiff seeking to recover damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act’s (FLSA’s) extended three-year limitations period for willful violations must do more than make a blanket allegation of “willfulness” to sustain a claim at the initial pleading stage. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
The court found that the Plaintiffs physician’s statement was conclusory, lacking in detail, and was based upon limited medical information. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:41 am by Liisa Speaker
Rather, the Supreme Court held that the IDEA’s exhaustion requirement applies only to cases where the gravamen of the plaintiffs suit is the denial of access to a free appropriate public education. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:20 am
The district court rejected plaintiff's consumer surveys and granted the defendants' motion to exclude plaintiff's survey experts because the surveys did not measure the purported advantages of plaintiff's technology. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:31 am by Cecere Santana, PA
Before the plaintiffs fiancé’s case concluded, he died due to injuries related to those that he sustained in the accident. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:31 am by Cecere Santana, PA
Before the plaintiffs fiancé’s case concluded, he died due to injuries related to those that he sustained in the accident. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 3:54 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
The appellate court stated that there was substantial contrary evidence supporting the defendant’s liability, including the plaintiffs’ testimony about the red light, the police report, and the witness statement. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:48 am by Stephen M. Ozcomert
On appeal, the plaintiffs argued that the evidence presented in the case clearly raised genuine issues of material fact as to whether Monroe County acted recklessly. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:48 am by Stephen M. Ozcomert
On appeal, the plaintiffs argued that the evidence presented in the case clearly raised genuine issues of material fact as to whether Monroe County acted recklessly. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 6:34 pm
"  Here, the district court specifically found the defendants chose their mark to advantage of the plaintiff's goodwill, and thus any reluctance to find infringement was inappropriate. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 5:04 am by Earl Drott
In an East Texas personal injury case arising from a motor vehicle accident, there are sometimes multiple witnesses who testify at trial regarding how the accident happened and the effects that it had on the plaintiffs physical health and well-being. [read post]
28 May 2016, 7:27 pm by Patricia Salkin
Thus, Plaintiffs contention that the merger was “ultra vires” was contrary to the position he took before the Board and the Law Division, where he conceded that merger was required as a matter of law. [read post]
4 May 2012, 12:59 pm by BuckleySandler
The district court, assuming plaintiffs allegations that the servicer was not a servicer and that the creditor was not a creditor for purposes of the motion to dismiss, granted the motion on the basis that neither the servicer nor owner was a debt collector under the FDCPA. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 2:14 pm by John C. Manoog III
As to the plaintiffs remaining arguments on appeal, the court ruled that the district court had acted appropriately in denying the plaintiffs motion to depose a particular expert witness, given the plaintiffs delay in seeking relief on this issue. [read post]