Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 7001 - 7020
of 9,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
Bruce Livingston v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
Jesse Perez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Estate of Ethel Bolton v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 6:25 am
However, Petco refused to let him return unless he provided a certification from his doctor stating that he was 100% recovered. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
She has to take special precautions just to make it through a day of work, and she sees doctors pretty much constantly. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
In Rossum v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:51 am
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
United States Texas State Representative, Giovanni Capriglione, introduced a privacy bill to the state legislature which closely follows the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:34 pm
Then, it is necessary to compare the videos and the stated activities to the claimant’s restrictions and limitations, and even have a doctor or treating physician review the surveillance video and provide an opinion. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:13 am
" Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:21 pm
” Hawaii Stevedores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
The case is Hurley v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 8:47 am
Judge Graves wrote the majority opinion in Campaign for Southern Equality v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
The invaluable Defamation Watch blog has a post on the case of Lucire v Parmegiani [2012] NSWCA 86 entitled “No absolute privilege for Doctor complaint”. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
Essentially, plaintiffs argued that the doctors at Westchester Medical Center failed to recognize that Theresa's problems stemmed from pancreatitis. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
X, R (on the application of) v General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 3271 (Admin) (09 December 2011) December 9, 2011 Decision of General Medical Council to refer to doctor’s severe depression in public decision was unlawful. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:26 am
The lower court had found the worker failed to give adequate notice of his need for leave and additionally had not shown that the employer’s reason for firing him—that he altered, falsified, or forged his doctor’s excuse—was pretextual (Johnson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:13 am
As the Supreme Court most recently reiterated in Shurtleff v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:09 am
Scherl asked her doctor for a release, which he provided, stating that she was not incapacitated and did not have any work restrictions associated with her pregnancy at that time. [read post]
