Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 7001 - 7020 of 9,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2009, 8:51 am
  The district court rejected Eastern's motion to confirm the post-amendment award. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:44 am by Josh Blackman
The Court does not use the phrase "capable of repetition yet evading review," but the first cited case, FEC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:32 pm by Lyle Denniston
Earlier this month, lawyers for an Oregon man, Juan Pineda-Moreno, filed the first GPS tracking case at the Court (Pineda-Moreno v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Wilson's due process state-endangerment claims (except against appellee Armitage), and would leave to the district court to address in the first instance appellees' defenses of immunity, see, e.g., Saucier v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm by Schachtman
When the Supreme Court delivered its decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:24 am by David DePaolo
So if a doctor said it was necessary then it was...Now, the First District Court of Appeals for California has agreed to hear a constitutional challenge to the IMR process.A date and time for the oral argument in Stevens v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
Responding to the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling last week in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 7:45 am by jameswilson29@gmail.com
The state supreme court first recognized the concurrent jurisdiction of state courts and the bankruptcy courts to address the dischargeability of  debts, in accordance with the original, but not exclusive, grant of bankruptcy jurisdiction to the federal district courts in 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 1:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
  (I'm omitting footnotes and the beginning of the first quoted paragraph and end of the last.)Judicial control over the evidence in a case cannot be abdicated to the caprice of executive officers. [read post]