Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 7001 - 7020
of 9,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Groves v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 9:07 am
Since the first prosecution was not criminal, there is no bar.Doe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit will hear oral arguments in Lebron v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:33 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court, agreeing with the district court, answered this question in the negative. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
The first of those is a 1941 decision, Hines v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:33 am
Banta v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am
On this blog, Orin Kerr previewed the search-related issue presented in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:17 am
Slater and Martinson do not deny that each of the first three judicial estoppel factors are satisfied. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Both the District and Circuit Courts rejected this argument. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Menu: Pierre v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
– Bonnie Sudderth, Judge of the 352nd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm
The First District Court of Appeal, Div. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:26 am
The circuit court’s order is based primarily on the reasoning of a recent decision by a United States district judge in Shelton v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands has jurisdiction to hear criminal cases arising under the laws of the United States even though its judges do not enjoy Article III protections, because the Court denied cert. in the twice-relisted Sun v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:45 am
The opinion is found at Wells v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
In so deciding, the District Court found that the language of the agreement was sufficiently similar to that in Simula, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:25 am
Madison, the seminal case which established judicial review, to the recent District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm
Koustas – We have previously reported (here, here, here, and here) on the court struggle in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the Court”) between FDA and Regenerative Sciences, Inc. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
Constitution because it requires implementation of an agency rule that violates a court decision, but instead of changing the law that the court decision was about, it simply exempts the illegal rule from judicial review. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
The Hill discusses some of the amicus briefs filed recently in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
