Search for: "W W Long" Results 7001 - 7020 of 13,935
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2015, 8:27 am
Our good friend David Williams has written a blistering review of a recent WSJ article on why people aren't buying Long Term Care insurance (LTCi). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
  “[W]hat exactly,” he asks, “was the ‘social harm’ identified by the Reynolds Court? [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:38 am by Hardee Bass
The post Back Door Deals & Smoke Filled Rooms – Tobacco CEO longs for the good ol’ days appeared first on Searcy Law. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:56 am by Dan Filler
Applicants should send a letter of interest and résumé to: John W. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 12:20 pm by Alexei Sobolev
Of the five priorities for early action listed in the European Commission’s Capital Markets Union green paper (lowering barriers to accessing capital markets, widening the investor base for SMEs, building sustainable securitization, developing European private placement markets, and boosting long-term investment), bankers speaking at the International Capital Market Forum’s annual conference earlier this month strongly agreed with only one of them: securitization. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 8:02 pm by Jason Rantanen
” However, the court also wrote that “[w]hile preemption may signal ineligible subject matter, the absence of complete preemption does not demonstrate patent eligibility. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 12:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
The main opinion in the case, written by Circuit Judge Judith W. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Editor’s Note: This is the first of two columns on James Robenalt’s January 1973: Watergate, Roe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
Further, “[w]hile the State legitimately may impose damages for the consequences of violent conduct, it may not award compensation for the consequences of nonviolent, protected activity. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 12:39 pm by Alan Morrison
” Finally, the majority turned to the question of whether requiring Jerusalem impinged on the president’s recognition power, observing, quite correctly, that the statute at issue “directly contradicts” the long-held executive branch policy on Jerusalem. [read post]