Search for: "Able v. United States"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 10,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2018, 4:35 am
Arab Bank that corporations are not liable under the Alien Tort Statute, we will have “corporations that are empowered to spend in American elections because of Bellotti and Citizens United; corporations that can make religious objections thanks to Hobby Lobby; and … corporations [that] will be able to aid and abet human rights violations abroad with impunity. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
” (Brief at p. 8)Of these, 1 and 2 are doing all the work, since 3 can be satisfied by any limitation at all on federal power – and as I and others have noted, that limitation is already provided by United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:03 pm
. . . .V. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:38 pm
The United States may, in accordance with paragraph (3)(A) collect double damages against any such entity. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
Last month, the United States Supreme Court refused to block a law in Texas that threatens the lives and life outcomes of girls who are pregnant as a result of statutory rape, incest, trafficking, and unwanted pregnancies, which is 99% of teen pregnancies. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The Great Migration had produced important swing blocs of black voters in northern and border states who in 1930 shocked the nation with their demand that a nominee to the Supreme Court care about racial justice. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
United States, 549 F. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:23 am
Koh's landmark FTC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:06 am
The European Court of Human Rights clearly recognised this in the case of Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 5:00 am
Many of these are also among the most abused drugs in the United States and New Jersey. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 2:50 am
IndiaP v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Amex was sued by the United States and several states, who argued that the anti-steering provisions in its contracts with merchants violate federal antitrust law. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:29 pm
Glucksberg and Vacco v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:04 am
Self-incrimination is prohibited by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 2:02 pm
SB 118 is the swift legislative response to the March 2022 decision in Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 1:40 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 5:35 am
Andrew is the author of "Are You a Canadian Injured in the United States? [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:01 am
" United States v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
