Search for: "Does 1-30"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 27,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 7:00 am
It is the administratively simplest and most straightforward way for the state government to tax a good, as it does not require valuation and as such does not require expensive administration. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:00 am
This rule does not apply, however, to employees laid off before April 1. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:10 am
How to best safeguard the data those technologies produce will hinge on the answers to three questions. 1. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:58 am
Towers (Ct. of Special Appeals)Filed: January 30, 2020Opinion by: James A. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:55 am
Lawmakers and governmental associations have called for between $300 billion and $1 trillion in state and local aid. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
In my last post,[1] I praised Lee Mickus’s recent policy paper on amending Rule 702 for its persuasive force on the need for an amendment, as well as a source for helping lawyers anticipate common judicial dodges to a faithful application of the rule.[2] There are multiple dodges used by judicial dodgers, and it behooves litigants to recognize and anticipate them. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:48 pm
However, this is limited to a list of diseases found in Schedule A, which obviously does not include COVID-19. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:25 pm
Oct. 30, 2017). [read post]
10 May 2020, 3:00 pm
And being #1 on the line is no guarantee of entry. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
8 May 2020, 10:25 am
What If a Claim of a COVID-19 Related Illness Is Not Rejected Within 30 Days? [read post]
8 May 2020, 7:33 am
Silver Law Group operates on a contingency-fee basis, so the firm does not profit unless we recover funds for you. [read post]
8 May 2020, 7:04 am
A 30-unit condominium with two condos securing a loan. [read post]
8 May 2020, 4:00 am
As a result, unrestricted fund balance as of June 30, 2019 totaled less than 1 percent of the next year’s appropriations. [read post]
8 May 2020, 4:00 am
As a result, unrestricted fund balance as of June 30, 2019 totaled less than 1 percent of the next year’s appropriations. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:00 am
Cash-Starved Candidates Trade Swanky Cocktail Hours for $5K Zoom Meetings Politico – Elena Schneider and Theodoric Meyer | Published: 5/1/2020 Online fundraising events show that even with coronavirus bearing down, the money machine of electoral politics is still cranking, albeit at a distinctly lower gear and in dramatically different form. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:43 pm
Question #44 could have indicated that it was intended to override or clarify Part 2(a) of the First Interim Rule, Question #3 and Question #33, but instead it is silent on that point.[4] Instead, Question #44 (released a month after the First Interim Final Rule and Question #3) injects uncertainty into the affiliation analysis by stating that the applicant “must count all of its employees and the employees of its U.S. and foreign affiliates” – does Question… [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:48 pm
The most important of these is that the extension for filing the Annual Report Form 5500 only applies to a small group of benefit plans: plans whose plan years ended on September 30, October 31, or November 30, 2019, or whose plan year ended on June 30 or July 30, 2019, and who filed for an extension. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:12 am
Force Majeure in California: Does the COVID-19 Pandemic Qualify? [read post]
