Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 15,523
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2015, 5:24 am
The case, Noll v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Certainly Roe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 1:19 pm
People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 1:06 pm
., Stengel v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:35 am
Marshall v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:28 am
See DeJames v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm
Figures given here suggest 68% of those leaving JSA enter paid work. [read post]
MAKING THE RELEASE OF THE DEPENDENCY EXEMPTION CONDITIONED UPON THE RECEIPT OF THE CHILD SUPPORT DUE
9 Jun 2015, 9:19 am
There is finally a case that you can cite to that stands for this proposition – specifically, Zeitlin v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:45 am
Probably not appropriate in workplace I’m not a fan of click-bait, so if you clicked the headlines and just want to know whether your company can still have a dress code policy after the Supreme Court’s decision in EEOC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 2:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
See McIntyre v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am
As a result, the stuff you need is so spread out you have to spend 20 minutes just figuring out which volume to dust off. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
In Case T-559/13 Giovanni Cosmetics Inc. v OHIM, Vasconcelos & Gonçalves SA two trade marks consisting of Italian names faced one another in a dispute focused on the distinctiveness of the shared forename "Giovanni" and the impact of the surname "Galli" within the trade mark applied for.Contested CTM applicationUS-based corporation Giovanni Cosmetics Inc opposed Goncalves's figurative Community trade mark (CTM) application for… [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 9:35 am
On June 4, 2015, the court decided Schaecher v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:16 am
The Lu Brush character was visually based on a simple yellow toilet brush figure with oriental eyes and a propensity for kung fu. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:50 am
In the STAYER trade mark dispute, Case T-254/13 Stayer Ibérica, SA v OHIM, ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’, the General Court provided useful guidelines on how to assess and prove that branded goods are complementary or in competition for the purposes of establishing their similarity and possibly the existence of a likelihood of confusion between their trade marks.This case regards an application for invalidity lodged by the Russian company Zao Korporaciya Masternet… [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 11:40 am
Which is why I think the Ninth Circuit has a sense that this figure would probably justify IFP status. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 10:12 am
In the years after Berman v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Nuxoll v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:57 am
Cascade Yarns, Inc. v. [read post]
