Search for: "John T. Michael" Results 7021 - 7040 of 7,047
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2006, 6:03 am
John Bracken replies to my question of yesterday about the changing (?) [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 5:15 am
But this critique of Rumsfeld's management style from Michael Ledeen is more troubling, because it's specific. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 8:06 pm
Or how bout some more defenses of Rush Limbaugh attacking Michael J. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 2:50 pm
I just can't resist this invitation to Googlebomb the election. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 7:13 pm
Texas prison system sources said Johnson wrote, "I DIDN'T DO IT. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 9:25 pm
Rather, what appears over the course of Kahan's essay is a plainly pragmatic concern: because shaming resonates as a partisan tool, it won't effectively capture a broad coalition of supporters, and without that support, shaming won't be a "politically acceptable" replacement for incarceration. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 2:19 pm
He just doesn't understand Jeter's world. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 1:10 pm
Don't I establish my complicity simply by doing nothing? [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 4:32 am
"Dr Michael Fullilove from the Lowy Institute said last week that it was very difficult for Australia to argue against the execution of its citizens while supporting the execution of people such as the Bali bombers. [read post]
10 Sep 2006, 3:23 pm
"On Friday, John Howard said that if death sentences were still in place after all avenues of appeal had been exhausted, "I will speak to President Yudhoyono and argue very strongly, as I did to the Prime Minister of Singapore some months ago in relation to Van Nguyen, because we don't believe in the death penalty. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 6:07 pm
Update: If you'd like to listen to the telephone calls between John Mark Karr and Journalism Professor Michael Tracey, you can do so here. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
That is not the issue of proportionality as such - proportionality as such is the situation where a commander, without any special or extra intent of wanton and depraved destruction, was nonetheless found liable under the laws of war for destruction because the court simply found it disproportionate as such.)The full declaration from which this is drawn can be found on SSRN, here, and the reply declaration to the plaintiffs experts (Michael Reisman and I were experts for the defendant… [read post]
21 Jun 2006, 2:15 pm
"Admirable indeed, but could John Williams write a score around it? [read post]
21 Jun 2006, 8:19 am
  Michael McCullough at Stingray: a blog for salty Christians gets wound up about Al Gore and some inconvenient truths about global warming. [read post]