Search for: "Lee v. LEE"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 7,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2009, 1:07 pm
Lee Partners and its 2005 IPO. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:00 am
We saw the same mindset in Kasky v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 11:19 am
The case is called United States v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:23 am
State v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 3:12 pm
Whitehouse v Lee [2009] EWCA Civ 375 is a rare beast - a successful appeal against a decision on reasonableness in the context of possession proceedings. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:55 am
Lee's argument stems from the influence bloggers had on Kennedy v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:11 am
" Lee v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:52 pm
The judge, applying NLRB v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:59 am
The technology was, in this context, not unconvincingly analogized by the Court to a searchlight, a marine glass, or a field glass (id. at 283, citing United States v Lee, 274 US 559, 563 [1927]). [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:18 pm
Baker Hostetler partner Lee Casey discusses the decisions. [read post]
9 May 2009, 6:00 am
Novak 90,000 170,000 0 260,000 Lee R. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:55 am
R (James) v Secretary of State for Justice (Parole Board intervening); R (Lee) v Same (Same intervening); R (Wells) v Same (Same intervening) (on appeal from R (Walker) v Same (Same intervening)) [2009] UKHL 22; [2009] WLR (D) 145 “The failure of the Secretary of State for Justice to provide courses to enable prisoners serving indeterminate [...] [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:47 am
Regina (Lee) v Same; Regina (Wells) v Same House of Lords “Although the Secretary of State for Justice had failed in his public duty to provide such treatment courses for prisoners serving indeterminate sentences for public protection as would enable them to demonstrate to the Parole Board that it was safe to release them, their post-tariff detention [...] [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:35 pm
The case is reported at U.S. v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 2:11 am
Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) v James (FC) (Appellant) (formerly Walker and another) R (on the application of Lee) (FC) (Appellant) Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) v James (FC) (Appellant) (formerly Walker and another); R (on the application of Lee) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) and one other action Secretary [...] [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:30 am
Lee, 505 U.S. 672 (1992). [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:06 am
For example, in Ting v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:44 am
(Lee)(Jolly): securities fraud claim in connection with squeeze out merger, breach of fiduciary duty, self-dealing, dissenters' rights. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:34 pm
Other comments on this case: * CMLP * Lee Gesmer Alvi Armani Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:42 am
Here is a Hutch News article reporting that Lee Timan won an acquittal in State v. [read post]
