Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 7021 - 7040 of 29,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
While federal law mandates a certain level of voter roll maintenance, states differ on how they manage their registration databases. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:55 pm by David Cole
    REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM As a candidate, Trump promised to overturn Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Since the mid-1970s, he has been deeply pessimistic about the possibilities of political change: Political action of any sort, he believes, cannot improve or ameliorate the condition of black people in the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Excerpt: Abstract & Part V: At Ground Level: Themes from the Study[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:03 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3472464 “In the wake of the 2013 United States Supreme Court decision of McBurney v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am by John Elwood
United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am by chief
 Now, we have encountered r.13 before (see our note on Willow Court v Alexander here). [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" There is very little case law that guides this issue, but the Second Circuit relies on United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
He concluded by stating that he had complied with the standard of care and had monitored the plaintiff’s clinical state at each visit, but had failed to note any indications of lithium toxicity. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 6:56 am by Jordan M. Asch
Per the newly-appointed Chief Resilience Officer and DEP Assistant Commissioner David Rosenblatt, “[w]e face many challenges from increasing temperature and sea-level rise. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 6:16 am by Sam Jungyun Choi
  The Opinion states that the Commissioner respects and acknowledges the decision of the High Court, but does not consider that the decision should be seen as a blanket authorization to use live facial recognition in all circumstances. [read post]