Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 7021 - 7040 of 20,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2008, 6:17 pm
I guess my first thought was whether it has any impact on State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:03 am by danny
Second, while Wikimedia, and before that EFF’s clients in Jewel v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 11:19 am by Florian Mueller
And as the briefs note, those companies invest huge amounts in R&D and hold vast numbers of patents.Unfortunately, Macomm Delrahim can make--or tell his subordinates to make--filings in the name of "the United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The United States Supreme Court is expected to conference on Charles Rhines’s petition for certiorari on April 12, 2019. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 2:04 pm
That system was introduced to limit parallel trade in drugs between Spain, where the administration sets maximum prices, and other member States, in particular the United Kingdom, where prices are fixed at a higher level. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Michael Dreeben
That both the United States and Israel are wrestling with these fundamental questions makes this an opportune time to revisit them. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
  You can, if you are interested, read more about the United States’ Federal Sentencing Guidelines in the Wikipedia entry you can find here.Guillotte made two arguments on appeal and the Court of Appeals addressed then in what seems to have been the order in which he articulated them. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:49 pm
Here's one thing I know for sure: the United States has the power to -- and actively does -- imposes taxes on residents regardless of where they're located and regardless of whether that income is earned in other countries. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   This question was left unanswered for a very long time, until the United States Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) resolved it in  Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm by Eric Segall
 Prior to the 2000 Supreme Court decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
The court went on to explain that, [a]fter he left office, Kitzhaber intervened in the grand jury proceedings, filing a motion to quash the subpoena in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Breidenbach
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers tells the “long-shot” story of United States v. [read post]