Search for: "Mark Cover" Results 7021 - 7040 of 18,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2015, 8:10 am by Glotzer & Sweat
However, these systems can have faults when there are improper road markings or the markings on the road are not visible. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 5:44 pm
It is sometimes desirable to have redacted information marked with a black box or marked as "Redacted". [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:41 pm by Marie Louise
Tabari (IP Law Blog)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps George Lucas – George Lucas uses power of the (legal) force on Jedi Mind (ArsTechnica) (Patent Arcade) (lawdit) (Techdirt) [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 12:34 pm by Gyi Tsakalakis
Perhaps they concluded that authorship mark-up was inappropriate for this static content page, however the page really ought to have publisher mark-up. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 8:14 am by Sara Parrello
For the GC, following the Board’s approach, the registrations of the earlier EUTMs would cover only “natural” preparations (i.e. non-chemical), i.e. goods that “were not even contemplated by the applicant neither referred to in the specification of those marks”. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:23 am by Steve Baird
Remember, Supplemental Registrations cover marks only capable of becoming distinctive and they are toothless in the protection they provide the owner — the Principal Register at the USPTO is the coveted prize reserved for those marks that are distinctive for their associated goods and services. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 6:36 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Companies found to have infringed trademarks may be permanently banned from using those same marks or names, compelled to pay triple monetary damages, cover the cost of corrective advertising to clear the brand confusion, forfeit their profits and pay plaintiff’s attorney’s fees. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:37 am by assoulineberlowe
Congress (use in commerce)Use of Mark on Different Goods/Services: Using the brand on goods/services outside of the registered classUse of Mark in Another Form: Material changes to markNon-use of a brand due to Covid-19 may be covered as excusable non-use under “Other Circumstance Beyond Holder’s Control” and/or “Catastrophe”. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 2:25 pm by Ron Friedmann
Another good daily update source, broader than just legal, is Mark T. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 12:34 pm by Gyi Tsakalakis
Perhaps they concluded that authorship mark-up was inappropriate for this static content page, however the page really ought to have publisher mark-up. [read post]
14 May 2007, 10:49 pm
Topics covered range from contractual matters and intellectual property protection to electronic commerce, data protection and liability of internet service providers. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:51 am by Kiran Bhat
Bill Mears of CNN covers both sets of cert. denials. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 4:02 am by Heidi Henson
Early last year, multiple press reports indicated that the President was considering expanding Executive Order (E.O.) 11246 – which currently covers race, color, sex, religion, and national origin – to include sexual orientation and gender identity. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:28 am by Kai Schmidt-Hern
According to the Bundespatentgericht, names are, in general, prototypical marks. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 1:16 pm
The regulations cover many complicated issues that arise with the election. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:32 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
The committee marked up the resolution today, May 14, and the House of Representatives as a whole is expected to vote on the measure tomorrow alongside the most recent proposal for coronavirus relief. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Nov. 26, 2013)Mark Warren wrote a blog post on Esquire Magazine’s Politics Blog. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Though the Second Circuit in Dallas Cowboys said that the Lanham Act covers confusion that “the mark’s owner sponsored or otherwise approved the use of the trademark,” that “otherwise approved the use” language, in context, means confusion that the mark’s owner sponsored or approved of the film. [read post]