Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 7021 - 7040 of 16,995
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
"The Appellate Division said that the Legislature, by subordinating the Judiciary to "its whims and caprices in matters of salary adjustments, brings the Judiciary closer to the world of politics than is tolerable for the disinterested functioning of a court system that must act for ‘the benefit of the whole people.'" In so doing, the court said that "The basic tenet of the separation of powers doctrine, to promote and… [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 11:38 am by Matt Maurer
In the recent case of Heller v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:57 pm by Giles Peaker
Goldie found that JKMK were advertising the property on short let sites, and there was evidence from other residents of various people coming and going. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:50 am by gstasiewicz
McKinley believes the American people deserve an explanation from the Federal Reserve about its secretive and massive bailouts – which are ongoing. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:28 am by Samuel Moyn
Granted, some people care about the questionable legality of the war, if not under international or constitutional then at least statutory law, for its own sake. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
” For the two people not employed by or named John Elwood who have made it to this point, you’re in luck: There’s more! [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm by Marie Louise
The People) ECJ rules in intermediary liability case L’Oreal v eBay (TechnoLlama) (IPKat) (Class 46) EPO: Amazon 1-click application found to lack inventive step (EPLAW) (IP Osgoode)   Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm by Marie Louise
The People) ECJ rules in intermediary liability case L’Oreal v eBay (TechnoLlama) (IPKat) (Class 46) EPO: Amazon 1-click application found to lack inventive step (EPLAW) (IP Osgoode)   Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am by Phil Dixon
Exigent circumstances supported stop and flashlight search of defendant where officers responded to gunshots in a residential area within seconds; grant of suppression motion reversed U.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In People v Trabazo [193 Misc.2d 436] (180 Misc 2d 961 [Crim Ct, Queens County 1999]), it was held that these limitations on superior courts were sound procedural mechanisms. [read post]