Search for: "People v. Tooks"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 12,219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2014, 4:02 am
Relying on the Tennessee Supreme Court case of Eaton v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Last year, when the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:44 pm
This case, AF Holdings v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:15 pm
Jones was a particularly gruesome case because he took so many with him, including three hundred little children. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:37 pm
The officer took Riley’s smartphone and searched through the portion of his contacts titled “Crip Killers. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:58 am
The lead case on forfeiture statutes, Bennis v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 5:35 am
In Petrella v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 5:14 am
Lichtenberger, supra.The judge then took up the issue Lichtenberger raised in his motion to suppress, noting that the 4th Amendment “establishes [the] `right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
23 May 2014, 9:30 am
In a recent case, Bryan Bank & Trust v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 4:54 am
Gile took the stand at his trial and testified that he lived in Colorado withhis new wife, Penny. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:47 pm
Unfortunately, there was nothing they could do as she took on water. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:06 pm
–Righthaven v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:25 am
Last week in Preap v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:35 pm
Under the Fourth Amendment it is unreasonable to seize evidence unless the evidence was within the plain view of the officer’s sight according to People v Spinelli, 35 NY2d 77 [1974] and the property was recovered as a result of an inventory search. [read post]
21 May 2014, 3:26 pm
Last week, the appellate court issued an important opinion in Green v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 2:31 pm
On appeal, the defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is not enforceable because the Supreme Court provided virtually no explanation regarding the waiver and took no measures to ensure that he, a first felony offender with a history of mental illness, understood it and was validly waiving his right to appeal. [read post]
20 May 2014, 12:05 pm
In the decision, Whitehead v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
In dealing with the first 150 years, they emphasize moments when We the People took the lead during the Founding and Reconstruction and the Progressive era. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:51 am
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The Ruling in Judicial Watch v. [read post]
