Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 9,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2020, 6:47 am
The employee had claimed that the employer discriminated due to his disability when it stated it would not allow him to return to work unless he could perform his regular duties. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
There follows a succinct account of Strasbourg jurisprudence on this point, from registration of a doctor Konig v Germany (No1) (1979-80) 2 EHRR 170 (civil right) to liability to tax (not a civil right) (Ferrazini v Italy (44759/98) (2001) STC 1314), via the all important decision in Pellegrin v France (2001) 31 EHRR 26 ECHR not to allow administrative servants the guarantees of Article 6 because their employment involves important… [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 2:23 am
Scott v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:16 am
Sweatt v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 9:11 am
Raich, supra, 545 U.S. 1, 26-29; United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 7:24 am
She will be a doctoral candidate in Philosophy at NYU starting this Fall.] [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:57 am
As I stated up top, I’m not defending his crime. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:45 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Mayo Foundation v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:05 am
In his June 13th decision in E.J. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:35 am
Days later, he received a letter from Liberty Mutual stating that he was approved for intermittent leave for the period in question, with five days of leave permitted per month. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:08 am
In West v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am
There was extensive testimony by doctors about the lesion and its interpretation. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:30 am
Additional Resources: Lyles v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 6:49 am
However, her only evidence of a “sinister” motive regarding her denial of workers’ comp benefits was that the HR manager spoke “one on one” with her doctor and the claims adjuster. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 5:21 am
And because the UAA was an essential function of his job, he was not a qualified individual at the time he was terminated (Silver v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:24 am
The employer’s motion to dismiss was denied (Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 6:10 am
The court adopted the reasoning of Ironworkers Local Union No. 68 v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:57 pm
In Kallstrom v. [read post]
5 May 2006, 2:24 am
First, the question came up in the context of a competency issue from a state court proceeding in Filiaggi v. [read post]
