Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 19,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 4:30 pm
The judgement in the case of Beizaras and Levickas v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
The court made clear in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 11:40 am
The strong ‘additional meanings’, or the acquired distinctiveness, take the sign out of the shadows of being a descriptive term and make it eligible for trade mark registration.Earlier this month, a case ruled by Beijing Higher People’s Court demonstrated the respective ways-out. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 1:14 pm
And it is a strong one. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
Atari v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Because human sex trafficking is so horrific, judges’ concerns about the problem may trump Section 230’s also-strong policy interests in judges’ eyes. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 1:56 pm
This concept was described by Lord Briggs JSC in Gavin Edmondson Solicitors Ltd v Haven Insurance Co Ltd [2018] UKSC 21 as promoting access to justice, as it allows solicitors to provide litigation services on credit to clients with strong cases who do not have the financial means to pay upfront. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm
Riley v Murray, then, sits uncomfortably with the Court of Appeal’s decision in Miller v College of Policing [2021] EWCA Civ 1926, which was handed down on the same day. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
On February 24, 2009, in No. 07-1437, Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
Spillars regarding Viereck v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:09 am
Well, except for the fact that Illinois v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 6:30 am
The police woke him, noticed a strong smell of alcohol on his breath, and he admitted that he had “a couple of drinks. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am
(Harris v Seward Park Hous. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
(Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
California and United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 2:12 pm
Jarkesy, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:02 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
Therefore, the exclusionary rule is applicable `[w]hen the police exhibit deliberate, reckless, or grossly negligent disregard for 4th Amendment rights, [and] the deterrent value of exclusion is strong and tends to outweigh the resulting costs. [read post]
