Search for: "United States v. John" Results 7021 - 7040 of 11,599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Attorney for the State: Joby Jerrells, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Brenwick Associates, LLC v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
United States and to reconsider its current Fourth Amendment doctrine, under which the answer to that question is a resounding no. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
United States and to reconsider its current Fourth Amendment doctrine, under which the answer to that question is a resounding no. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As John Vile argues in his insightful 2016 book, Convention Wisdom, if state legislators control the convention calls and later ratification of the convention’s proposals, they should definitely not also fill the convention itself: checks and balances are essential within the Article V convention process (p.146). [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:24 am by Mark Walsh
’s opinion announcement in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 4:30 am
United States, the court considered whether a taxpayer could bring a tax-refund suit in a federal district court if he did not first pay all of the taxes sought by the Treasury. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 11:00 pm
Because Ho’s clerkship at the Court did not end until July 2006, he is barred (if I understand the rule) from any participation in the United States Supreme Court docket until late this summer. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 9:53 am by Charles Kotuby
Last week, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in Republic of Hungary v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm
”  For several minutes, it looked like die deutsche ’Schaft was going to give the United States the shaft. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
United States NPR reports on the so-called “pink slime” libel case between Beef Products Inc and ABC News will take place in a South Dakota state court this week. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:05 am
(2) Whether, if the petition is not granted prior to September 25, 2007 -- when Pfizer's pediatric exclusivity for Norvasc comes to an end -- the Court should instead grant the petition and order the Court of Appeals' judgment vacated under United States v. [read post]