Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 29,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2008, 7:04 am
Blixt, __ F.3d __, 2008 WL 5003239 (9th Cir. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:47 pm
The defendant was driving westbound on Grand, approaching its intersection with Mulligan. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:43 am
., 858 F.3d 1093 (7th Cir. 2017). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:24 am
Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLC, --- F. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 10:38 am
Summarizing broadly, the Court first identified several “[f]undamental legal principles critical to adequate defense of a criminal charge,” including that “each defendant is entitled to the undivided loyalty of his attorney. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
“That SJS/TEN may be more predictable in the future if a particular discovery is made says nothing about Defendants’ negligence. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:08 pm
This case differs from McTiernan, 546 F.3d 1160 (9th Cir. 2008), where the 9th allowed a withdrawal because counsel never told defendant about a suppression issue, and counsel never investigated or pursued it. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 10:42 am
TGC, Inc., 329 F.3d 792 (11th Cir. 2003). [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:17 am
The defendant was charged with 1326. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 5:02 am
Rodriguez-Morales, 929 F.2d 780, 784-85 (1st Cir. 1991), and that has been repeatedly endorsed by both the Supreme Court and the courts of this circuit. [read post]
28 Jul 2004, 12:35 pm
Vazquez, 271 F.3d 93, 107-115 (3d Cir. 2001) (en banc) (Becker, C.J., concurring).Fanfan Brief in Opp. 6. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 12:35 pm
See In re Nat’l Prescription Opiate Litig., 956 F.3d 838 (6th Cir. 2020). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:14 pm
Sprint Nextel Corp., 501 F.3d 1354 (Fed. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 1:30 pm
In a bad sign for the defendants, the opinion was issued just 20 days after oral argument. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:47 pm
Terhune, 250 F.3d 1223, 1232-1233 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm
Mateo, 560 F.3d 152 (3d Cir.2009), the Third Circuit held that a defendant sentenced under § 4B1.1 was not “sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission” under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 8:49 am
Prevo (11th Cir. 2006) 435 F.3d 1343, 1346.) [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:49 am
The defendant employer removed a pair of W. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:00 pm
Stulock, 308 F.3d 922 (8th Cir. 2002), while affirming convictions of child pornography knowingly saved to a hard drive, the Eighth Circuit cited with approval the trial court's acquittal on the charge of possession of images found in the defendant's cache file, stating, 'The possession charge specified only the images found in the browser cache. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:16 pm
Hodson, 543 F.3d at 287. [read post]
