Search for: "In Re L."
Results 7041 - 7060
of 22,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2010, 7:24 am
So is it about the li'l town where she lives? [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:07 am
Moreover, the applications at issue are based on intent-to-use, and so there has been no opportunity for confusion.Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found confusion likely, and it affirmed the refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:56 am
I think I could have done it in 22 pages, max.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:45 am
In re Capital Financial Advisors, Inc., Serial No. 76661472 (October 24, 2008) [not precedential].click on picture for larger imageApplicant feebly argued that the phrase does indeed serve as a mark "because it was separately displayed and used in conjunction with" its services. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:22 am
" -ed.].And so the Board affirmed the refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
Unsatisfied by Applicant's Half-Baked Arguments, TTAB Affirms 2(d) Refusal of "TIRAMISU BY ISABELLA"
4 Jan 2007, 7:14 pm
In re Cappucino's Cafe, Ltd., Serial No. 76586779 (December 12, 2006) [not citable].The Board readily found the marks to be "highly similar" and the goods "closely related. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
[TTABlogged here].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:10 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:35 am
Just two days after oral argument, the Board issued its decision in In re Himalaya Global Holdings, Ltd., Serial No. 77117183 (May 14, 2010) [not precedential], reversing a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark SOLIGA FOREST HONEY for honey [FOREST HONEY disclaimed]. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 5:13 pm
"The Board therefore unsurprisingly affirmed the Section 2(d) refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
" In re B. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 3:27 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:25 am
" In re Diane R. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
Pointing to a design patent that claimed "the ornamental design for a security puck," the Board noted that PUCK may even be generic for the goods.It therefore affirmed the refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 4:31 am
In re No-Burn Investments, L.L.C., Serial No. 76629397 (November 30, 2007) [not precedential].The Board quickly disposed of the first issue: whether the mark that appears on the application drawing (SILENT FIREMAN) is a substantially exact representation of the mark shown in the specimens (Rule 2.51(a)). [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
In re Kinetic Energy Corporation, Serial No. 77707733 (May 31, 2011) [not precedential].Applicant's website and press releases indicated that its goods and services relate to the generation of power from the motion of vehicles. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 11:30 pm
"The mark as a whole immediately informs purchasers that applicant's ovens, ranges, and cooktops feature and use a dome-shaped temperature sensor.And so the Board affirmed the refusal.TTABlog comment: Well, the appeal fee is only $100.00.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:17 pm
They're so special, in fact, that:"[L]egislation has been carefully drafted to avoid the imposition of significant legal requirements on collectively-bargained plans in the middle of applicable bargaining cycles. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Not surprisingly, the Board answered in the negative.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 10:09 pm
" Or something like that.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
