Search for: "Mark Cover" Results 7041 - 7060 of 18,228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2017, 2:55 am
|Launch Event: Advancing women in tech, law and policy, ChIPs comes to London on 27 April 2017|Am I covered by that UK copyright exception? [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:41 am
Perhaps “division” would better serve – EUTMs previously covering 28 countries should be (one way or another) divided into an EUTM covering 27 and a UKTM covering 1.3. [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:32 am
Class 46 Blog discusses some of the observations made by the EUIPO concerning the consumer's perception of the Contested Mark.JIPLP: Current Intelligence - The scope of protection of Lacoste's trade mark in TurkeyJIPLP’s latest Current Intelligence covers the case of Lacoste’s registration of a ‘Crocodile’ trade mark for goods in classes 11, 20 and 21 which was rejected by the Turkish Court of Cassation. [read post]
14 May 2017, 2:54 pm by Andrew Delaney
” Plaintiff was covered by a homeowner’s policy issued by Defendant. [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:45 pm
Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGP),[7] which had been endorsed unanimously by the same Human Rights Council only three years before in June 2008.[8] The move from the operationalization of a soft law framework for coordinating the public law based duty of states to protect human rights with the private law, transnational, and social norm based responsibility of enterprises to respect human rights seemed to some incompatible with a move to consider a comprehensive treaty… [read post]
12 May 2017, 7:25 am by Robert Kraft
” The company’s warning covers devices “made before May 2015, which are in use in about 350,000 people worldwide. [read post]
12 May 2017, 7:04 am by Jared Dummitt
Cayetano said that, among other things, the talks would cover the territorial claims of both sides, and the development of a bilateral Code of Conduct. [read post]
12 May 2017, 6:00 am by Francisco Macías
While we’re on the subject of Mexico, something we didn’t mention–but that our readers may like to know–is that this year marks the centennial of the Mexican Constitution of 1917. [read post]
  The Order marks the administration’s first successful effort to address cybersecurity, after an earlier draft executive order on cybersecurity was postponed in January. [read post]
11 May 2017, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Law, Aesthetics and Copyright Historiography: A Critical Reading of the Genealogies of Martha Woodmansee and Mark RoseKathy Bowrey4. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm by Helen Klein Murillo
Politico reports that Chuck Schumer and Mark Warner have each called for a special counsel. [read post]
10 May 2017, 12:20 pm by davidferriero
As the current term of the FOIA Advisory Committee approaches the one-year mark, I am looking forward to hearing more about their findings, and reviewing their recommendations. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:00 am by Legal Help for Veterans
“Overcharging VA depletes funds that are available to care for our veterans,” said Mark Myers, director of the VA Healthcare Resources Division. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am by Jacqueline M. Allen
This month marks the one-year anniversary of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)’s long-awaited beneficial ownership rule, which imposes certain Customer Identification Program (CIP) requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:05 am by Martha Engel
However, the logo is one of the oldest, still active marks on the Trademark Office’s register. [read post]
10 May 2017, 4:33 am by SHG
” Does that cover the Crips and Bloods, MS-13? [read post]
9 May 2017, 10:00 pm by Coral Beach
All of the Aunt Jemima products sold by Pinnacle Foods are covered by a trademark license agreement with The Quaker Oats Co. [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:59 pm
|Launch Event: Advancing women in tech, law and policy, ChIPs comes to London on 27 April 2017|Am I covered by that UK copyright exception? [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
The ACLU’s most comprehensive standing argument, designed to cover all of the plaintiffs—including those who do not appear to have relatives at risk of being locked out of the U.S. [read post]