Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 7041 - 7060 of 178,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2008, 2:44 pm
Conradt's brother Louis, who killed himself after he was accused of engaging in "sexually explicit" conversations with an adult who posed as a child for the NBC... [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 5:52 pm
Defendant's medical malpractice lawyer is asking the court to compel a 2 hour interview from Plaintiff with Defendant's vocational rehabilitation expert, arguing that that because Plaintiff's vocational rehabilitation expert interviewed the Plaintiff, the Defendant is being put at a disadvantage by not being able to ask his own questions. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:27 am
In granting plaintiff's motion for a permanent injunction, the court rejected defendant's argument that "[plaintiff] has always held a majority share in the market [at issue], even after the introduction of the [defendant's product], thus suggesting that the continued presence of [defendant's product] would cause no harm. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:58 am by David Bernstein
And by the way, for the record, I contacted the plaintiff's linguistics expert and got ahold of and read his report. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 7:25 am by Moseley Collins
The Plaintiffs agree with the moving party's argument that the Plaintiff's second cause of action for Negligence is duplicative of the Plaintiff's eighth cause of action for Professional Negligence as to the Defendant, Dr. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 7:25 am by Moseley Collins
The Plaintiffs agree with the moving party's argument that the Plaintiff's second cause of action for Negligence is duplicative of the Plaintiff's eighth cause of action for Professional Negligence as to the Defendant, Dr. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 7:00 am by The Silber Law Firm LLC
In response to plaintiffs lawsuit seeking fees, defendant moved to dismiss based on the arbitration provision in the rider. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:44 am by Howard Friedman
The court likewise affirmed dismissal of plaintiff's invasion of privacy and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:40 am by Woodrow Pollack
The Supreme Court’s holding in Octane Fitness makes clear that § 285 imposes only one restriction on the imposition of attorney’s fees: “that the power is reserved for exceptional cases. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:40 am by Woodrow Pollack
The Supreme Court’s holding in Octane Fitness makes clear that § 285 imposes only one restriction on the imposition of attorney’s fees: “that the power is reserved for exceptional cases. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:54 pm by David Krenkel
Employment Lawyers representing plaintiffs were dealt a set back by New Jersey's Appellate Division this week when the Court took a rare turn away from its usual liberal stance on discrimination cases. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 6:49 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Court’s Decision The Court rejected plaintiffs proposed approach and granted Chevron’s motion to compel production of the litigation funding agreement. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 10:55 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 The defendant argued that the plaintiffs allegations involved conduct that occurred as early as 2010 which had been the subject of an ongoing investigation since December 2011 with respect to plaintiffs employment, and February 2012 with respect to plaintiffs tenure as a graduate student. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
She explained that if the plaintiff thought that the defendant had wrongfully claimed the plaintiff on the defendant’s tax return, the plaintiffs remedy was not to sue her sister, but to file her own tax return claiming a personal exemption for herself. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 2:48 am by Gregory B. Williams
February 19, 2019), the Court granted in part and denied in part the identical motions of defendants AGCO Corporation and Precision Planting LLC to dismiss Plaintiff Deere & Company’s claims for enhanced damages based on willful infringement for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:41 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Plaintiff's past history amply supports the conclusion that plaintiff will likely abscond with the child if permitted unfettered access. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 1:39 pm by Arslan Sheikh
” Court’s decision on mandatory vaccination policy The court denied plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction. [read post]