Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 7041 - 7060 of 7,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2016, 7:17 am by Daniel Schwartz
  And so the case will likely proceed to discovery and then another round of motion practice. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:02 pm
    . . . and the interpretive wheel goes round again. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
The 1709 Blog carries a note on a piece of litigation in which News International came out on top, Ebden v News Int;l, in which the judge held that (among other things) a nearly-completed round of negotiation to use a video clip of a footballer having a fight didn't actually count as a promise to pay a large sum for it. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:42 am
  Until I read the 8th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:33 am by lawmrh
No word, though, on state-approved pitchforks in public buildings. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
His memory should be kept for what it deserves–that of the greatest all-round athlete of our time. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:55 am by Victoria Kwan
Justice Sotomayor rounds out our June list of events with a trio of Washington, D.C., events. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:54 pm by Scott Bomboy
” The Washington Post’s quote round-up had a more diverse set of opinions. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 7:31 pm by Kaimipono D. Wenger
” It will assess the market definition analysis — the heart of antitrust analysis — in FTC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:44 pm
In the Supreme Court, hyper-technicalities are most frequently used to defeat the claims of deserving plaintiffs, as in the now-Congressionally-overruled Ledbetter case or even worse, in Bowles v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 10:12 pm by Lara
Related Posts: Teachbook Teaches Facebook a Lesson, Fights Back by Filing Motion to Dismiss Trademark Infringement Suit Geekview IP week(s) Review Facebook v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm by Ken White
That view is strengthened by the steady progress of the law since 2012 in cases like Cox v. [read post]