Search for: "Sell v. Sell" Results 7041 - 7060 of 23,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s signed agreement with the nonparty funder, selling a portion of his interest in any potential future litigation proceeds, “conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claim as a matter of law,” as it shows that defendants did not commit any misconduct by failing to warn plaintiff of the terms of the agreement (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; see CPLR 3211[a][1]), which plaintiff admittedly signed (see VXI Lux Holdco S.A.R.L.… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
Pacific Bell Telephone Co., dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications - the Ninth Circuit held the Sherman Antitrust Act permits "price squeeze" claims against companies with no duty to sell to others at wholesale. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
A copy of the decision can be found below: Silvertop Associates Inc., DBA Rasta Imposta v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:05 am by Tom Webley
” In doing so, Judge Steeh followed the reasoning of the Northern District of California, who addressed this same issue of Article III standing in connection with Michigan’s VRPA in Deacon v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
Today's story is about greed and the fact that one (very bloated) company doesn't have enough of your money.In Disney Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]