Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 9,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am
Indeed, it is this relationship which gives rise to the duty imposed upon the doctor to properly treat his or her patient (see Bazakos v Lewis, 12 NY3d 631, 634; Payette v Rockefeller Univ., 220 AD2d 69, 72; Ellis v Peter, 211 AD2d 353; Heller v Peekskill Community Hosp., 198 AD2d 265; LoDico v Caputi, 129 AD2d 361, 363; see also Speigel v Goldfarb, 66 AD3d 873, 874). [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Liebeck v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:54 am
’” In re Jobes, 108 N.J. 394, 407-08 (1987) (alteration in original) (quoting State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 4:23 pm
One of the more illogical and unfair legal rules involving medical malpractice lawsuits stems from a mid-century United States Supreme court case Feres v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 1:28 pm
The company allegedly denied him re-hire after he did not produce a release from his doctor. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
[M v Slough para 33] In that case, M, who needed a refrigerator for his medication and access to a doctor, did not need 'looking after. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
[M v Slough para 33] In that case, M, who needed a refrigerator for his medication and access to a doctor, did not need 'looking after. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
To highlight this position, the Court referred to the Seventh Circuit decision of Mead Johnson v Abbot Laboratories (2000) where the Court considered whether the phrase "1st Choice of Doctors" could be misleading (picture, left - picture of the product with the blue ribbon in left hand corner). [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
" Section 11 deals with third party information and sub-section (1) thereof is extracted below: "(1) Where a Central Public Information Officer or a State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, intends to disclose any information or record, or part thereof on a request made under this Act, which relates to or has been supplied by a third party and has been treated as confidential by that third party, the Central Public Information Officer or State… [read post]
Healthcare and Federalism: Should courts strictly scrutinize federal regulation of medical services?
14 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
But here's the rub: Limits on insurance coverage provided by the feds under Medicare (or PACA) will obviously affect the standards of medical care provided by state-regulated doctors and hospitals. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 7:53 am
Potter v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 7:53 am
Potter v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:59 am
Consequently, Jonathan received notice of the settlement, which stated that if Dr. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:29 am
Hutcheson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 6:45 am
This question was answered earlier this year in the case of Manary v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:13 pm
Justice Dennis Thomas stated: When faced with a “very ill man” Dr. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Mayo v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
In DiGeronimo v. [read post]
