Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 7041 - 7060 of 9,091
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Marion County Election Board The key United States Supreme Court case analyzing the constitutionality of state voter ID laws is the 2008 case of Crawford v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:57 am
We can remind ourselves of the majority decision of the Constitution Bench of this court in Additional District Magistrate Jabalpur v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am by SHG
Blumenfeld can judge.This should be a huge win, a great day for judicial independence. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 5:33 am by Russ Bensing
  It happened in yesterday’s 8th District decision in State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
Part I: SLAPPS – A Weapon Against Public Participation During the 1970s SLAPPs were recognized for the first time as a legal phenomenon in the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:26 am
We know that Peters and DeLaughter have been accused of running a similar scam in the Eaton v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:41 am by Anthony Lake
According to a press release yesterday by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), on November 8, 2011, the Court will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit first developed this approach to summary judgment in Jeffreys v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 11:10 am by Philip Favro
  First, the Ninth Circuit declined to create by judicial fiat a “civil litigation” exception that would allow the production of the emails. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
As such, it would be a waste of judicial resources to proceed with the Superior Court action prior to the resolution of the CRA/CLC suit. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
As such, it would be a waste of judicial resources to proceed with the Superior Court action prior to the resolution of the CRA/CLC suit. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:09 am by Alison Rowe
 It was obvious that they did not wish that case to be the first judicial precedent for ClassicStar breeders. [read post]