Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 7061 - 7080 of 10,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2008, 5:58 pm
In fact little or no justification is offered by the Commission for this conclusion.Kerkhoven again arose for consideration, however, within the context of X, Y & Z v United Kingdom (1997). [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:09 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Peñagarícano has been a speaker in many Intellectual Property seminars and conferences in Puerto Rico and in the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:38 am by Vishnu Kannan
  The Supreme Court’s application of Fourth Amendment protection to the attachment of a GPS tracking device to a car in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am by CMS
In particular, does it relate to: (i) the Union of the Kingdoms of Scotland and England; and/or (ii) the Parliament of the United Kingdom? [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:03 am by Sherin and Lodgen
However, tenants (or the party that controls, is controlled by, or is in common control with the tenant entity) that (i) operate in multiple states, (ii) operate in multiple countries, (iii) are publicly traded, or (iv) have 150 or more full-time equivalent employees are expressly excluded from the definition of “small business premises unit. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 12:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States, is whether a mixed verdict actually clears the way for a new prosecution because the jury’s actions conflicted with each other, wiping out the effect of the innocence part of the verdict. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:18 am
That inconvenience, however, is one of the fundamental protections that separates the United States of America from totalitarian regimes. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
Difficult Legal Issues in the Healthcare Case Before the Supreme Court By R Tamara de Silva March 27, 2012 Arguments began yesterday before the United States Supreme Court on the future of President Obama's healthcare bill, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("ACA" or "Obamacare"). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm by Chidera Anyanwu
The United States also has unsuccessfully attempted copyright reform to protect fashion designs, and the debate about the adequacy of its current copyright protections continues.[12] The United States Supreme Court’s holding in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm by Chidera Anyanwu
The United States also has unsuccessfully attempted copyright reform to protect fashion designs, and the debate about the adequacy of its current copyright protections continues.[12] The United States Supreme Court’s holding in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:50 am by Chidera Anyanwu
The United States also has unsuccessfully attempted copyright reform to protect fashion designs, and the debate about the adequacy of its current copyright protections continues.[12] The United States Supreme Court’s holding in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]