Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 7061 - 7080 of 12,448
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2014, 7:25 am by Joy Waltemath
He was placed on leave on July 1 but was not discharged since he had six months of accrued vacation and sick leave. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:49 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
— Larry Port (@larryport) September 27, 2014 Hope you enjoyed the Twitter give and attack among the four of us. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 12:23 pm by admin
A winning contractor or sub-contractor does not accept the contract. 6. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
That’s what a Minnesota statute — now being challenged before the Minnesota Court of Appeals — does: Subdivision 1. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:08 am
 Specifically, Pincelli argues: (1) there was not a meeting of the minds; and (2) the email(s) referenced by Plaintiff does not satisfy the statute of frauds. . . . [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
Want to join [and 27 good souls already have]? [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:51 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
The agency does allow some degree of flexibility with respect to the ABV percentage stated (i.e., 27 CFR 4.36(b)(1) allows for a 1.5% tolerance for wine containing 14% of less of alcohol by volume), but not to the extent the agency presumes an industry member may be avoiding a higher tax bracket from which the government stands to obtain revenue. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 10:16 am by Cody Poplin
Yamal is a $27 billion natural gas venture hoping to tap into the tremendous reserves hidden under the Siberian plain and double Russia’s stake in the worldwide LNG market. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Nike, Inc., 27 Cal. 4th 939 (2002): “For a significant segment of the buying public, labor practices do matter in making consumer choices. [read post]
In this five part series, originally published in the Summer 2014 edition of the Media Law Resource Center Bulletin,[1] we take an in-depth look at the native advertising phenomenon and the legal issues surrounding the practice. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
  The government declined to intervene, id. at *1, meaning:  (1) that it thought the suit not worth pursuing, and (2) the relator was free to pursue whatever allegations he wanted. [read post]