Search for: "Low v. Low"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 15,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2015, 12:30 am
Last week I predicted that the High Court would affirm the finding of five judges of the Federal Court of Australia that AstraZenenca’s patents covering low-dosage forms of the cholesterol-lowering drug marketed as CRESTOR (having the active ingredient rosuvastatin) are invalid on grounds of obviousness.In the much-anticipated decision in AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd (et al) [2015] HCA 30, five judges of the High Court, in four distinct concurring opinions, have… [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
The Castaneda v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:11 pm
Watch v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 8:19 am
Virag, SRL v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
That decision was reversed by the full NTSB on relatively narrow grounds not relating to the FAA’s “commercial v. recreational” distinction, and the case was eventually settled, with the drone operator admitting to no violations of any rules. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:51 am
Assn. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:51 am
Assn. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:06 am
In Molina v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:49 am
Ordziejeski v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:49 pm
Its ruling in State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:30 pm
The guy clearly did stuff he shouldn't have done, and his Apprendi challenge to California's low-mid-high sentencing scheme faces a serious uphill battle.I mention the case only because I wanted to get your take on his offenses.Here's what the guy did:"Creech and his wife, Reanna, have a four-year-old daughter, Sofia, and a three-year-old son, Zachary. 2 One evening in September 2007, Creech and Reanna had an argument because Creech told Reanna he had obtained… [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 9:20 am
In the case of Sorrels v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
When cops evaluate a use-of-force incident, they ask whether it was justified, focusing on the legal rule set by the Supreme Court in the 1989 case Graham v. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 10:29 pm
August v Chisago County Board of Commissioners, 2015 WL 4877658 (MN App. 8/17/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/mn-court-of-appeals/1710859.html Filed under: Current Caselaw, Special Use/Exception Tagged: mounted shooting event, shooting range [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 10:58 am
Headache and low-grade fever may also accompany this illness. [5, 25, 33] People infected with norovirus usually recover in two to three days without serious or long-term health effects. [5, 25] Although symptoms usually only last one to two days in healthy individuals, norovirus infection can become quite serious in children, the elderly, and immune-compromised individuals. [10, 18, 33] In some cases, severe dehydration, malnutrition, and even death can result from norovirus… [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:00 am
The bill was held in committee by the Assembly Committee on Appropriations this week, and will not likely make it out of the Committee this year. 3) California Supreme Court addresses arbitration agreements and what makes such agreements “unconscionable” and therefore unenforceable In a consumer case, the California Supreme Court ruled in Sanchez v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 2:28 pm
Courts of Appeals Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2015cta.htmlSeminole Tribe of Florida v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
