Search for: "M. B.1."
Results 7061 - 7080
of 13,699
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2014, 2:05 pm
P & B Autobody, 43 F.3d 1546 (U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 10:20 am
Hulu says that inclusion of the word “aggrieved” in the statute indicates that some sort of injury is a prerequisite to statutory damages, but the court says no: the practical import of the statute is that the words “aggrieved person” in subsection (c) mean the same thing they do in subsection (b)(1): a consumer whose personally identifiable is disclosed by the video provider in violation of the statute. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:37 pm
1. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 2:54 pm
I’m a bit at sea about the third recommendation. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:46 am
I’m still open to suggestions for topics or themes for the next year. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 3:23 am
Section 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness:Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is SUPER-PHARM Merely Descriptive of Drug Store Services? [read post]
Oral Argument Preview: Some Post Schwartzwald Foreclosure Standing Stuff. Bank of America v. Kuchta.
30 Dec 2013, 7:03 am
George M. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
To the victories: 1. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:11 pm
I do, however, have 5 things I’d add now that my first year as a lawyer recently wrapped up: 1. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 7:01 pm
., quando Alexandre, o Grande, conquistou o Oriente Médio. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 7:01 pm
., quando Alexandre, o Grande, conquistou o Oriente Médio. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 339, at para. 8. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 10:11 am
As longtime readers know, I’m a huge fan of Canadian bloggers. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 8:27 am
., and Howard M. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:31 am
§ 3(b)(1). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 11:01 am
The other two asserted unlawful purposes are (1) online harassment per Penal Code 653m(b) (criminalizing “repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device”), and (2) the civil tort of public disclosure of private facts (citing a troubling precedent, In Re Rolando S.). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:27 am
If A and B both confess their crime, each of them serves 2 years in prison (lose-lose) If A confesses but B denies the crime, A will be set free whereas B will serve 3 years in prison, and vice versa (big win, big lose) If A and B both deny the crime, both of them will only serve 1 year in prison (win-win) If we take two parties—let’s say two nation states for now—the situation is in many ways parallel: If nations A and B both… [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:17 am
State, 2013 WY 98, 307 P.3d 860 (Wyo. 2013).)Issues: 1) Did the district court abuse its discretion when it determined that testimony regarding previous violence in the appellant’s relationship with the victim was admissible under W.R.E. 404(b)? [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:01 am
Let’s hope Tennessee legislators get the message, though I’m pretty appalled that they’ve even tried this. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 3:19 am
Evli ve 1 çocuk babası ziraat mühendisi Tarık Söğüt,bankalara olan kredi kartı borçlarını maddi sıkıntı yüzünden ödeyemedi ve bunalıma girdi. [read post]
