Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 7061 - 7080 of 12,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2008, 9:24 pm
He took it to the civil justice system, where a jury decided that Mr. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Its decision yesterday in Thibodeau v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 12:27 am by Falk Metzler
The petition was signed by more than 500 people, among them many well-known players of Australian (open source) software industry, as affirmed in this posting of the OSS gazette OStatic, not forgetting to once again point to the OSS community's familiar enemies and their alleged outrages (e.g. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 11:52 pm by Frank Cranmer
” Ellie Serridge and David von Hagen, Lexology: Balancing protected characteristics – religious belief v sexual orientation: Ngole v Touchstone Leeds: judgment here. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
On 13 August  Ofcom had a news piece “Fewer people getting news from social media”. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
A quick, non-exclusive list of common examples we frequently encounter are: Facts alleged by the declarant without foundation, i.e. without personal and direct sensory observation of the matter asserted (e.g. my husband smacked the child because I saw the child had a bruise when I picked her up from his house); Conclusory statements subject to less abstract, more specific ways of conveying the information (e.g. he is an abuser, or she is a liar); Legal conclusions that invade the… [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am by familoo
He had some pretty strong words about the decision of his predecessor Sir James Munby in a case called A v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
When he announced his retirement, I was just completing my year as his clerk, so I took a special interest in who would be his successor. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Susan Brenner
Ultimately, [LaBrie] removed the `tags’ that identify people in photos on Facebook and later took down the photos. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
Here, when the state could not locate two witnesses and the judge refused to grant a continuance, the prosecution took its ball and went home: the prosecutor actually stated “the State is not participating in this case. [read post]