Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 7061 - 7080 of 178,486
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2023, 2:18 pm by Josh Richman
  Affirming a trial court’s March 2022 decision, the appeals court found Tuesday that Public Resource’s use is for nonprofit, educational purposes, and that this use serves a different purpose than that of the plaintiffs. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:52 pm
It's a case involving the scope of specific personal jurisdiction in a particular trademark context, so it's not an issue that you'd think would generate much heat. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:36 pm by Sophia Cope
But the court rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that the Registration Requirement prevents them from doing so because of the rule’s chilling effect on the social media activity of would-be visitors to the United States. [read post]
A spokesperson for plaintiff and former Governor Andrew Cuomo celebrated the ruling, stating, “Truth and reason won, mob rule lost today. [read post]
Plaintiffs filed the suit claiming the Alabama legislature drew the state’s congressional maps in a way which was racially gerrymandered. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:16 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Supreme Court held that a plaintiff alleges a “domestic injury” as mandated under RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:16 am by centerforartlaw
Free Holdings, the plaintiff, was an anonymous Canadian holding company that took advantage of an ownership loophole in minting NFTs and coined a replica of McCoy’s Quantum, in the same space that had been previously occupied by McCoy’s original NFT. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 8:48 am by Marcel Pemsel
Background The plaintiff is part of the Coty group of companies (‘Coty’), which has produced and sold perfumes for over 100 years. [read post]
Because the plaintiffs did not meet the statutory ten-year requirement for either claim, the Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s ruling. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
 The company also deviated from its procedures in delaying plaintiff's return to work. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 6:31 am by Unknown
While the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss in part, several of the plaintiffs’ claims that a physical therapy company misled about therapist attrition survived the court’s preliminary analysis (Phoenix Insurance Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 5:56 am by Daniel Miller
The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, recently reversed a trial court's ruling, and held that a defendant bank owed the plaintiff law firm a duty of care based on the special relationship the bank had with the law firm as an intended beneficiary of a probate court’s blocked account order. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
The court explained that proximate cause refers to a direct link between a Defendant’s actions and a Plaintiffs harm. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 4:52 am by Daniel Schwartz
Employee’s Role in the Process: The plaintiff declined the offered accommodation, claiming it was in bad faith because he would lose his K-9 handler role. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
But here the Township’s zoning ordinance gave plaintiffs little reason to expect the treatment they have received....... [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:45 am by Eric B. Meyer
Now, let’s drill into the timeline: On November 13, the company entered the plaintiffs AIP bonuses into its internal systems, with the amounts scheduled for payment on November 25. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:59 pm by Kendall Lowery
First, the plaintiffs argued that Article II, Section 2(a) of the California Constitution only allows citizens to participate in elections. [read post]